Research and Opinion in Anesthesia & Intensive Care

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2016  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 168--172

A comparative study between the macintosh laryngoscope and the king vision video laryngoscope in endotracheal intubation


Sherif M Elhadi, Wafaa K Rady, Ahmed M Elfadly 
 Department of Anaesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt

Correspondence Address:
Ahmed M Elfadly
Department of Anaesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, 313 Elhorreya st Sporting Alexandria, Alexandria
Egypt

Background Airway management remains a vital primary skill for anaesthesiologists. We aimed at comparing the efficacy of direct laryngoscopy using the conventional Macintosh blade with indirect laryngoscopy using the King Vision video laryngoscope (KVVL) with regard to visualization of the laryngeal view, speed of intubation and intubation success rate. Patients and methods A total of 100 adult patients were randomly categorized into two equal groups (50 patients each): group M patients were subjected to general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation using direct laryngoscopy with the conventional Macintosh blade; and group K patients were subjected to general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation using the KVVL; the entire procedure of laryngoscopy and intubation was evaluated and all patients were intubated by one anaesthetist experienced in the use of each laryngoscope. Results The KVVL performed better in these patients by reducing haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation, improving the Cormack and Lehane glottis view, reducing the need for optimization manoeuvres and reducing the difficulty Likert scale score compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope (ML). There were no differences in intubation time, success rates and complications between both devices. Conclusion This study validated the efficacy of the KVVL compared with the direct ML. The KVVL performed better than the ML.


How to cite this article:
Elhadi SM, Rady WK, Elfadly AM. A comparative study between the macintosh laryngoscope and the king vision video laryngoscope in endotracheal intubation.Res Opin Anesth Intensive Care 2016;3:168-172


How to cite this URL:
Elhadi SM, Rady WK, Elfadly AM. A comparative study between the macintosh laryngoscope and the king vision video laryngoscope in endotracheal intubation. Res Opin Anesth Intensive Care [serial online] 2016 [cited 2020 Feb 19 ];3:168-172
Available from: http://www.roaic.eg.net/article.asp?issn=2356-9115;year=2016;volume=3;issue=4;spage=168;epage=172;aulast=Elhadi;type=0