• Users Online: 234
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 2  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 73-78

Evaluation of the efficacy of dexmedetomidine infusion on the quality of balanced anesthesia and postmastectomy pain


Department of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt

Correspondence Address:
Ashraf E Alzeftawy
MD, Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, 31120 Tanta
Egypt
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2356-9115.172793

Rights and Permissions

Background The authors studied the effect of intraoperative infusion of dexmedetomidine on the quality of anesthesia, anesthetic requirements in patients undergoing radical mastectomy, and its effect on acute and chronic postmastectomy pain. Patients and methods A total of 76 female patients undergoing radical mastectomy were randomly classified into two groups: group I received intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion and group II, the control group, received an infusion of normal saline. Heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, end tidal isoflurane concentration, amount of fentanyl and muscle relaxant increments, recovery characteristics, quality of postoperative analgesia for 3 days, and incidence of side effects were recorded. Incidence of chronic pain was reported after 6 months. Results There was a significant decrease in mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate in group I from 1 min after skin incision and onwards. Extubation time and response to verbal command were significantly shorter in the dexmedetomidine group than in the control group (P = 0.003 and P < 0.0001, respectively), and end tidal concentration of isoflurane was significantly lower in group I (P < 0.0001). There was a significant decrease in fentanyl requirement in the operating room in group I (P < 0.0001). Time to first analgesia was significantly longer in group I (P < 0.0001). There was a significant decrease in postoperative analgesic requirement and a better quality of analgesia in the dexmedetomidine group (P < 0.0001). Pain scores at 6 months were comparable in both groups. Conclusion This study showed that the use of intravenous dexmedetomidine had a sparing effect on anesthetic and analgesic requirements with hemodynamic stability effect and no protective effect from the development of chronic pain.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed297    
    Printed6    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded66    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal